Exposure Fusion in Photomatix for ultra-natural photos

Article by Wojciech Toman


A long time ago when no one had heard about HDR, photographers were still able to increase the dynamic range of their photos. What they did, and many photographers still do, was to open several exposures in Photoshop and blend them using layer masks.  When they blended the layers they had to decide which image to use for each region of the image. This way they could restore highlights using an underexposed photo and details in shadows using an overexposed one.  Nowadays this technique is commonly referred to as manual blending.

Exposure Fusion is based on that experience but it is an automatic process. Instead of doing it manually you can blend your images directly in Photomatix. Basically exposure fusion is about taking the best pixels from all photos and outputting them to the final image. Whether a pixel can be considered good or bad depends on many factors like for instance colour saturation, well-exposedeness, low noise-level etc. Also exposure fusion isn’t limited to simple read and write operations. For any pixel it can take data from 1 image or from all images and to calculate the mean of values read. It can also increase colour saturation and much more. The possibilities are virtually endless.

Unfortunately not many HDR software offers exposure fusion. Photomatix (both Pro and Essentials) and Enfuse are the most popular ones with such functionality built-in. I will focus on the first one in this tutorial.

Before jumping into the details on processing, here are some of the benefits of using Exposure Fusion:

  • exposure fusion results in noise reduction (contrary to local tone-mapping which amplifies noise) – this makes it perfect for night and long-exposure “HDR” photos,
  • images have more natural look,
  • images are free of halo artifacts,
  • using exposure fusion might be easier because it has fewer parameters to set – also it is more intuitive as many photographers are familiar with notion of blending images.

And here are drawbacks of it:

  • images lack local contrast compared to tone-mapped images. However, this can be improved in post-processing,
  • high memory usage that increases with bit-depth and number of images,
  • works only with multiple exposures, if you need to use it for a single exposure you need to derive multiple exposures from it (eg. by adjusting Exposure slider in Lightroom and then exporting as TIFF/JPG).

As you can see from above, exposure fusion produces images that doesn’t have problems typical of HDR photography: noise, halos and unnatural look. Sounds great, doesn’t it? Well, that’s one of the reasons exposure fusion became so popular amongst real estate photographers.

Creating fused images in Photomatix Pro

Creating fused images in Photomatix Pro doesn’t differ much from regular tone-mapping workflow. The main difference is step 1 below:
1) Make sure to use a dedicated RAW converter to convert images to JPG/TIFFs prior to loading them into Photomatix. This way you will achieve best quality. The reason for this is that the Raw converter built into Photomatix is quite simple – although sufficient for tone-mapping it doesn’t produce as good results when used together with exposure fusion. For this reason I always develop my images in Lightroom and then export them to Photomatix using the Lightroom plug-in (which comes with your copy of Photomatix Pro).
2) You start by selecting photos to fuse. As I already mentioned you need 2 or more photos to be able to use Exposure Fusion in Photomatix.
3) After clicking ok, you need to specify Preprocessing Options. I specified them this way and clicked Ok:

A few notes here. First of all if you’re using Lightroom, make full use of it. It has a powerful Raw converter so if you still remember point 1, it’s better to use it instead of Photomatix’s. Another benefit is that Photomatix integrates pretty well with Lightroom. If you haven’t already, make sure to install the Lightroom plug-in which comes with your copy of Photomatix. This way if you right click your images -> select Export -> Photomatix Pro you will be able to run Photomatix directly from Lightroom.

For this example I shot the photos with a tripod (7 exposures at 1 EV spacing). There could still be some small horizontal and vertical movement so I checked Align images by correcting horizontal and vertical shifts box. Also there were some people moving in the frame so I checked Remove ghosts option.
4) In Preview mode switch Process to Exposure Fusion:

5) Just below Process, there is a method combo-box. Select one of the following methods:

  • Fusion/Natural – it produces the most natural-looking results (hence the name). I will focus on this method in this tutorial,
  • Fusion/Intensive,
  • Fusion/Auto – fuses images automatically, you can’t control the process at all,
  • Fusion/Average – averages the images. Same as above – you have no influence on the look of the images,
  • Fusion/2 images – let’s you select two images of all your exposures and then fuses only them,
  • Fusion/Realistic – this option produces best results (at least for real estate photographers), however, it is also the most computationally-expensive one. For this reason it’s only available in batch mode

6) Specify parameters. For Fusion/Natural they are:

  • Strength – strength of local contrast enhancements. I usually leave it at 0.0 or move it to the left (negative values) as it tends to produce more natural looking images
  • Blending point – specifying negative value gives more weight to underexposed images; positive values give more weight to overexposed images in turn. If it sounds confusing – moving slider to the left makes Fusion algorithm “prefer” underexposed photos. Moving to the right, make it prefer overexposed ones.
  • Shadows – brightens the shadows. I usually move this value to 10.0 which is maximum for this setting. This way I can restore more details in shadows.
  • Local contrast – increases sharpness and local contrast of details in the image. I mentioned that Exposure Fusion does have worse local contrast than tone-mapping – this setting tries to overcome this. I try to keep this value in range 0.0 to 3.0. Larger values might result in a painterly and unnatural look. Value of 2.0 usually works best.
  • Color saturation – increases or decreases saturation of colors in the image. I usually keep it at 0 as I play with colour later in Photoshop or Lightroom.
  • White clip – clips the highlights. I usually don’t change it.
  • Black clip – clips the shadows. I usually don’t change it.
  • Midtone – specifies brightness of midtones. I usually move it to the right to the degree that depends stricly on the image

For my image I used settings from the image above.

7) Hit process button and save your image

At this stage your photo might look like this:

It looks natural, that’s for sure. However, it lacks contrast and colours a little bit (especially compared to tone-mapped images). So what I typically do at this stage is to open my photos in Lightroom or Photoshop and apply some adjustments there. Most of the time I increase contrast, colour saturation and sharpen my images. After that I end up with a photo like the one at the beginning of this article.

Wojciech Toman

I’m self-taught landscape and HDR photographer and passionate computer developer from Warsaw, Poland. Since 2010 I join my both great passions while working on Photomatix Pro.



Opinions expressed here represent my thoughts and opinions only and not the opinions of my employer.

  • Carl

    Never tried exposure fusion. I’m curios gonna try tonight

  • Nikon_bob

    I tried it with a set of nine that I tone mapped in Detail Enhancer. The Detail Enhancer was far better, the shot(s) were taken in day light. Fusion may work better in high contrast situations.